210 Wis. 2d 694 - State v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2020
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · 128 Wis. 2d 110 - State v. Holt · 106 Wis. 2d 368 - State v. Alles · Oseman v. State · 120 Wis. 2d 614 - State v. Denny
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Relevant evidence is evidence that has any tendency to make the existence of a fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more or less probable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This court has ... recognized that relevance is defined broadly .... Thus, there is a strong presumption that proffered evidence is relevant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We do not consider whether the 'legitimate tendency' test is an appropriate standard for the introduction of third-party defense evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.