Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 210 W. Va. 265 - In Re McMillian

210 W. Va. 265 - In Re McMillian’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Hiss · 166 W. Va. 226 - In Re: Brown · 134 W. Va. 204 - In Re Eary · 170 W. Va. 583 - Lane v. W. Va. State Board of Law Examiners · 164 W. Va. 234 - In Re Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court reviews de novo. " (Citations omitted.)); In re McMillian, 210 W.Va. 265 , 557 S.E.2d 319, 321 (2001) ("This court reviews de novo the adjudicatory record made before the ... Board of Law Examiners with regard to questions of law, questions of application of the law to the facts, and questions of whether an applicant should or should not be admitted to the practice of law. Although this court gives respectful consideration to the Board of Law Examiners' recommendations, it ultimately exercises its own independent judgment. On the other hand, this Court gives substantial deference to the Board of Law Examiners' findings of fact, unless such findings are not supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on the whole record .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re WDP

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.