White v. Barill’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Carey v. Piphus · 161 W. Va. 154 - Waite v. Civil Service Commission · 160 W. Va. 248 - North v. West Virginia Board of Regents · 166 W. Va. 702 - Clarke v. West Virginia Board of Regents
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Syllabus Point 4 of Barazi v. West Virginia State College, 201 W.Va. 527 , 498 S.E.2d 720 (1997), this Court held that “ ‘[t]he proper remedy for reversible due process procedural defects in administrative proceedings is to remand the case to the appropriate tribunal with directions to order the administrative institution to remedy the defect.’ Syl. Pt. 4, Clarke v. West Virginia Bd. of Regents, 166 W.Va. 702 , 279 S.E.2d 169 (1981).” Thus, we find that the circuit court should have remanded this case to the Commission to address White’s procedural due process rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.