Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

211 A.D. 868

Reed v. N. E. Vail & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1924-12-15

Decided 1924-12-15

¶1Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.. While it was error to strike out testimony given by plaintiff on his -examination in supplementary proceedings, we think it was not prejudicial to the defendant, as other testimony on the same subject was subsequently received.

Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ.
/211/ad/868 · .json · Public domain