¶1Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.. While it was error to strike out testimony given by plaintiff on his -examination in supplementary proceedings, we think it was not prejudicial to the defendant, as other testimony on the same subject was subsequently received.
211 A.D. 868
Reed v. N. E. Vail & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1924
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1924-12-15
Decided 1924-12-15