Ex Parte Coleman’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
88 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably 575 So. 2d 91 - Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc. (1991), Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnell (1930)
88 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Madden's Case · Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. · Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co. · Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co. · Garrett v. Gadsden Cooperage Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It is of course the settled rule everywhere that these acts are to be liberally construed in favor of the workman; but this does not mean, as counsel seem to argue, that the rule as to the measure of proof, of the sufficiency of evidence, is different from the rule in ordinary cases. The burden is on the plaintiff to reasonably satisfy the trial court that the accident arose out of and in the course of the workman's employment, and, where there is any substantial legal evidence in support of the finding of the trial court, the judgment, whether affirmative or negative, will not be disturbed on appeal."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““It is well settled that a willful assault upon an employee, whether by a fellow workman or a third person, may be an ‘accident’ within the definition of the act. Garrett v. Gadsden Cooperage Co., 209 Ala. 223, 225, 96 So. 188” (citing other authorities).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““If, on any reasonable view of the evidence, it will support the conclusion reached in the trial court, the finding and judgment will not be disturbed.” Ex parte Sloss-Sheflield Steel & Iron Co., 207 Ala. 219 , 92 So. 458 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.