Ingram v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2015
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hodges Bros. v. Coleman & Carroll · Blakey's Heirs v. Blakey's · Penticost v. Massey · Nelson v. Iverson · Milbra v. Sloss-S. S. & I. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In Milbra v. S.S.S. I. Co. , 182 Ala. 630 , 62 So. 179 , 46 L.R.A.(N.S.) 274, this court wrote: "`A person may adopt what name he pleases, and if he deals with others, or goes to court in a name, no matter what, no harm is done.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This is supported by Carlisle v. People's Bank, 122 Ala. 446 , 26 South. 115 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In 29 Cyc. p. 270, we find this general text:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.