Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 Ark. 696 - Cox v. Danehower

Cox v. Danehower’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2019

12 state decisions

4019471950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pletner v. Southern Lumber Co. · Harrington v. Cooper · Bell v. Gentry · Bowlin v. Vinsant · Adams v. Eagle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court has often ruled that where land is conveyed, or devised, to a person and the heirs of the body, children, or issue of such person, such conveyance or devise creates an estate in fee tail in the grantee or devisee, which, under our statute [now § 18-12-301] becomes an estate for life only in the grantee or devisee, and a fee simple absolute in the person to whom the estate tail would first pass, according to the course of the common law, by virtue of such devise, grant or conveyance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “more than one estate in remainder may be limited after a single particular estate if the limitation is in the alternative so that one may take effect if the other does not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “during her life, at her death, or should my said wife not survive me, unto my daughter, Gertrude Vinsant, and unto the heirs of her body.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.