Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 F.1d 544 - Sheeler v. Alexander

Sheeler v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

211 F. 544 · 1913

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 1944
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on In re Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co. · Pittsburgh Reduction Co. v. Cowles Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co. · Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Stanley Instrument Co. · Deitch v. Staub · Boston & R. Electric St. Ry. Co. v. Bemis Car-Box Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 19: “The court may at any time, in furtherance of justice, upon such terms as may be just, permit any process, proceeding, pleading or record to be amended, or material supplemental matter to be set forth in an amended or supplemental pleading. The court, at every stage of the proceeding, must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.” Rule 34: “Upon application of either party the court or judge may, upon reasonable notice and such terms as are just, permit, him to file and serve a. supplemental pleading, alleging material facts occurring after his former pleading, or of which he was ignorant when it was made. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.