Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 F.2d 241 - Mitchell, Secretary of Labor v. Joyce Agency, Inc

Mitchell, Secretary of Labor v. Joyce Agency, Inc’s Empirical Analysis

211 F.2d 241 · 1954

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
June 1976
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 1976 · most notably Mitchell v. Jaffe (1958), Shultz v. Parke (1969)

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

130195419601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 207

Relies on Kirschbaum v. Walling US Arsenal Bldg Corporation · Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · McLeod v. Threlkeld · Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Lenroot · Fleming v. Jacksonville Paper Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce’ means an enterprise which has employees engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, including employees handling, selling, or otherwise working on goods that have been moved in or produced for commerce by any person, and which— “(1) during the period February 1, 1967, through January 31, 1969, is an enterprise whose annual gross volume of sales made or business done is not less than $500,000 * * and beginning February 1, 1969, is an enterprise whose annual gross volume of sales made or business done is not less than $250,000 * * * ” 29 U.S.C. § 203 (s) (1964 Ed. Supp. II).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.