Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 F.2d 73 - Lemke v. United States

Lemke v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

211 F.2d 73 · 1954

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
February 1999
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 1999 · most notably Mims v. United States (1967), United States v. Mandujano (1974)

30 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

20019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Coplon · Lemke v. United States · 36 Cal. 2d 373 - People v. Jones · Commonwealth v. Peaslee · Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. Castle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[t]he evidence here was sufficient to show that Lemke had put in motion a procedure which, had it not been interrupted in consequence of the intervention by the officers, would have resulted in $60 being paid by check to Elbert for vegetables never delivered or intended to be delivered. Had Lemke’s plan been consummated the Civilian Mess would have been defrauded in consequence of Lemke’s false pretenses.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.