Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 F.2d 798 - Anderson v. McKay

Anderson v. McKay’s Empirical Analysis

211 F.2d 798 · 1954

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
February 1973
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1973

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

40195419601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 30 U.S.C. § 181 (Coal Market Competition Act of 2000) · 30 U.S.C. § 193 · 30 U.S.C. § 226 · 43 U.S.C. § 201 · 43 U.S.C. § 894

Relies on Brewster v. Gage · Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp. · Sanford's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Great Northern Ry Co v. United States · Billings v. Truesdell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““So in this case, so far as the 1914 Act is concerned, we think it sharply restricted all patent rights which had theretofore existed, but had not been exercised, in respect to lands reported to be valuable for certain mineral deposits. * # * * * * “Even if the 1887 Act were held to eliminate the mineral land exclusion from patentability, the requirement for a patent still remained, and the Secretary had to pass upon the application. And in the meantime, in 1914, before any application was filed, Congress imposed a new restriction upon patents to mineral land. That, too, was a matter for the Secretary to pass upon.” 211 F.2d at 803, 807 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.