Kyle v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
211 F.2d 912 · 1954
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1991
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Beavers v. Haubert · Frankel v. Woodrough · Shepherd v. United States · Atlantic Fishermen's Union v. United States · Conway v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As remarked in Beavers v. Haubert, 198 U.S. 77, 86 , 25 S.Ct. 573, 575 , 49 L.Ed. 950 , the constitutional right of an accused to a speedy trial ‘must be considered with regard to the practical administration of justice.’ There the Court further observed, 198 U.S. at page 87 , 25 S.Ct. at page 576 : ‘The right of a speedy trial is necessarily relative. It is consistent with delays and depends upon circumstances. It secures rights to a defendant. It does not preclude the rights of public justice.’ * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stiltner v. Rhay
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.