Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 F.3d 1004 - Luberda v. Trippett

Luberda v. Trippett’s Empirical Analysis

211 F.3d 1004 · 2000

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
May 2020
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably Simpson v. Jones (2000), Guilmette v. Howes (2010)

10 federal appellate ·

340200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Ford v. Georgia · Rogers v. Howes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “alleges grounds for relief, other than jurisdictional defects, which could have been raised on appeal from the conviction and sentence or in a prior motion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “deemed to have been apprised of [the rule's] existence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.