Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 F.3d 1148 - Michael Jackson v. Arthur Calderon, Warden

Michael Jackson v. Arthur Calderon, Warden’s Empirical Analysis

211 F.3d 1148 · 2000

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2022 · most notably Silva v. Woodford (2002), United States of America v. Pantelis Antonakeas (2001)

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

570200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson · Brecht v. Abrahamson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Strickland prejudice analysis is complete in itself; there is no place for an additional harmless-error review.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a habeas petitioner asserting a freestanding innocence claim must go beyond demonstrating doubt about his guilt, and must affirmatively prove that he is probably innocent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “failing to prepare and investigate for a penalty defense, counsel clearly fell below the requisite standard of competence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.