Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

211 F.3d 1227

Docket No. 98-6261.

Pryor v. Reno

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2000-05-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2000

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Janet Reno Attorney Generals v. Charlie Condon Attorney General of South Carolina

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-05-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Jack M. Curtis, Alabama Dept, of Public Safety, Billington Malone Garrett, John J Park, Jr., Leura J. Garrett, Kenneth E. Vines, Montgomery, AL, Frank W. Hunger, Asst. Atty. Gen./U.S. Dept, of Justice, Civil Div., Washington, DC, Anne Miyako Hayes, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

¶2Gregory S. Feder, Marc Richard Balu-da, Arter & Hadden, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.

¶3Before TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, and GODBOLD and HILL, Senior Circuit Judges.

¶4BY THE COURT:

¶5The Supreme Court of the United States, having vacated and remanded this case for further consideration in the light of Reno v. Condon, 528 U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 666, 145 L.Ed.2d 587 (2000) it is therefore

¶6ORDERED AND ADJUDGED,

¶7that the judgment of the district court in the above-referenced case is hereby VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama for further consideration in light of Reno v. Condon, 528 U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 666 (2000).

/211/f3d/1227 · .json · Public domain