Stx Llc v. Brine Inc Warrior Lacrosse Inc’s Empirical Analysis
211 F.3d 588 · 2000
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. · Tec Air, Inc. v. Denso Manufacturing Michigan Inc. · United States v. Smith · Weatherchem Corporation v. Jl Clark Inc · Ferag AG v. Quipp Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may be satisfied in at least two ways: by proof of reduction to practice before the critical date; or by proof that prior to the critical date the inventor had prepared drawings or other descriptions of the invention that were sufficiently specific to enable a person skilled in the art to practice the invention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“where a patentee defines a structurally complete invention in the claim body and uses the preamble only to state a purpose or intended use for the invention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether the subject of the barring activity met each of the limitations of the claim, and thus was an embodiment of the claimed invention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.