Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 FSUPP 460 - Wright v. Rockefeller

Wright v. Rockefeller’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
March 2010
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2010

6 federal appellate · 4 district ·

100196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 2 U.S.C. § 2 · 2 U.S.C. § 2A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Baker v. Carr · Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Gomillion v. Lightfoot · Plessy v. Ferguson · Hernandez v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Gomillion case has no application whatsoever. There some 400 Negro residents of the city of Tuskegee who were entitled to all the privileges of city residents including voting were deliberately disenfranchised from such voting by a wholly irrational drawing of new city boundaries which did not even slightly veil the obvious purpose of excluding Negroes as city voters.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.