Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 Ga. 210 - Humthlett v. Reeves

Humthlett v. Reeves’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Garza v. State (2008), McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. Robinson (1973)

30 state decisions

9019541960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ellison v. Georgia Railroad · Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. State · South View Cemetery Association v. Hailey · Harris v. Duncan · Gazan v. Heery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The legislative intent will prevail over the literal import of the words.” . . . “In the case of a mistake in a reference in a statute to another statute, . . . where the real intent of the legislature is manifest, and would be defeated by an adherence to the terms of the mistaken reference, the mistaken reference will be regarded as surplusage, or will be read as corrected, in order to give effect to the legislative intent.” . . . “Legislative enactments are not, any more than other writings, to be defeated because of mistakes, errors, or omissions, provided the intention of the legislature can be collected from the whole statute.” [Cits.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Minor errors, even if quite obvious, or important errors if their existence be fairly doubtful, may be adhered to and repeated indefinitely; but the only treatment for a great and glaring error affecting the current administration of justice ... is to correct it. When an error of this magnitude and which moves in so wide an orbit competes with truth in the struggle for existence, the maxim for a supreme court, supreme in the majesty of duty as well as in the majesty of power, is not stare decisis, but fiat justitia ruat coelum [let justice be done, though the heavens should fall].””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “no one could have been led to rely upon it as permanently fixing the law and been misled by it to his hurt and injury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.