Jackson v. Record, Admr.’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 2003 · most notably Shields, Arnett L. v. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation (1987), Muncie Power Products, Inc. v. United Technologies Automotive, Inc. (2003)
9 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Buck · Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Clark · Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. Collarn · Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co. v. Jester · 59 Ind. App. 55 - Smith v. Graves
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While it is true that no one testified as to the value of these services in dollars and cents, we do not think such evidence essential to the submission of such evidence to the jury. It is for the jury in the range of discretion given them under the law and the evidence, and applying the results of their common observation and daily experience, to estimate and determine the value of such services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. FMC Corp. v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.