Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 Kan. 1 - Irwin v. Irwin

Irwin v. Irwin’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
July 1981
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Christlieb v. Christlieb · Stout v. Stout · Hardman v. Hardman · Duffy v. Duffy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘A parent who is able to care for his children and desires to do so, and who has not been found to be an unfit person to have their custody in an action or proceeding where that question is in issue, is entitled to custody as against grandparents or others who have no permanent or legal right to custody.’ ” (In re Eden, 216 Kan. 784, 786 , 533 P. 2d 1222 .)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In determining the right of custody of children between parents, the primary consideration is the best interest and welfare of the children, and all other issues are subordinate thereto.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.