Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 La. 326 - State v. Texas Co.

State v. Texas Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2006

9 state decisions

201947195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Brenner v. Noe · State Ex Rel. Shell Oil Co. v. Register of State Land Office · Labarre v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co. · State v. Texas Co. · Booksh v. A. Wilbert Sons Lumber & Shingle Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * It is the well-established law of this State that, where a boundary between two parishes has never been surveyed and established by conjoint survey and a certain section has been treated by parochial authorities and the owners as lying wholly within one of the parishes, the Court will apply the maxim ‘L’erreur commune fait le droit’. See Cumming v. Boissatt, 2 La.Ann. 794 ; * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.