Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 La. 64 - Paline v. Heroman

Paline v. Heroman’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1980
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1980

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

3019461950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Succession of Baum · Jacob v. Falgoust

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When all the heirs in the nearest degree renounce the succession, which is accepted by those in the next degree, these last are considered as having succeeded directly and immediately to the rights and effects of the succession from the moment of the death of the deceased.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.