Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 Mich. App. 634 - People v. Hellis

211 Mich. App. 634 - People v. Hellis’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
December 2000
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 287 · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he language and history of Const. 1963, art. 1, § 11 provide no justification for rejecting application of the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule where, as here, the police presented their information in support of a determination of probable cause, wholly untainted by any improper police conduct, to a neutral and detached magistrate, a member of the judicial branch.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Aln increasingly popular tactic of those criminally charged with violating state and federal drug laws and correlatively subjected to forfeiture proceedings is to concede in the forfeiture proceedings at the earliest opportunity and, thereafter, seek to avoid criminal sanctions by moving to dismiss pending criminal charges on double jeopardy grounds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.