Love v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
84 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably 445 So. 2d 798 - Williams v. State (1984), 671 So. 2d 647 - Peterson v. State (1996)
84 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kelly v. State · May v. State · Crosby v. State · State v. Sam · Rogers v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Every material fact and essential ingredient of the offense every essential element of the offense must be alleged with precision and certainty, or, as has been stated, every fact which is an element in a prima facie case of guilt must be stated in the indictment." ( 211 Miss. at 611 , 52 So.2d at 472 ).”
15 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State · Jones v. State“the fact that defendant is a male person above the age of eighteen years is a sine qua non of the crime”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a male person above the age of eighteen years.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.