Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

211 N.C. 206

189 S.E 509

State v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1937

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1937-01-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1975

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1937-01-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Stacy, O. J.

¶1 The defendant by his appeal seeks to test tRe constitutionality of the traffic ordinance which makes it unlawful for more than two taxicabs, owned by the same company, to be parked in a single block in the city of Greensboro at the same time. The warrant is not sufficient to charge a violation of the ordinance. Indeed, it charges no offense at all. The action will be dismissed on authority of S. v. Beasley, 196 N. C., 797, 147 S. E., 301, and S. v. Shipman, 203 N. C., 325, 166 S. E., 298.

¶2 It is not after the manner of appellate courts to decide constitutional questions except in the exercise of judicial power properly invoked. S. v. Williams, 209 N. C., 57, 182 S. E., 711; In re Parker, ibid., 693, 184 S. E., 532; Newman v. Comrs., 208 N. C., 675, 182 S. E., 453; Wood v. Braswell, 192 N. C., 588, 135 S. E., 529. A warrant that cRarges no offense will not suffice for such invocation, even though its invalidity be observed sua sponte. S. v. Beasley, supra.

¶3 Action dismissed.

/211/nc/206 · .json · Public domain