211 N.C. App. 427 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Where the pornography possessed consists solely of incestuous encounters, there arises a strong inference that the possessor is sexually excited by at least the idea of, if not the act of, incestuous sexual relations. Accordingly, in this case, the fact of [the defendant's] possession of incestuous pornography reasonably supports the inference that [the defendant] was sexually desirous of an incestuous relationship.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Davis

2. “was of an uncommon and specific type of pornography; the objects of sexual desire aroused by the pornography in evidence were few; and the victim was the clear object of the sexual desire implied by the possession.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Davis