Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 N.C. App. 497 - State v. DeBiase

211 N.C. App. 497 - State v. DeBiase’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Negron v. United States · Griffith v. United States · Hankerson v. North Carolina · FMC Corp. v. Holliday · State v. Wilkerson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] judge presiding over a jury trial must instruct the jury as to a lesser[-]included offense of the crime charged where there is evidence from which the jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant committed the lesser[ ] included offense. In determining whether the evidence is sufficient to support the submission of the issue of a defendant’s guilt of a lesser[ [included offense to the jury, courts must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant. However, if the State’s evidence is sufficient to fully satisfy its burden of proving each element of the greater offense and there is no evidence to negate those elements other than [the] defendant’s denial that he committed the offense, [the] defendant is not entitled to an instruction on the lesser offense.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the State's evidence is sufficient to fully satisfy its burden of proving each element of the greater offense and there is no evidence to negate those elements other than [the] defendant's denial that he committed the offense, [the] defendant is not entitled to an instruction on the lesser offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “holding that ... an Arbor Mist wine bottle, with which the defendant hit the victim in the head, was a deadly weapon [ per se. ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.