Larson v. Bedke’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2001
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McKeone v. Red Ball Transfer Co. · Fisher v. Minor · Ricketts v. CONTINENTAL NATIONAL BANK OF LINCOLN · Andrews v. Nebraska State Railway Commission · State v. Kortum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Utah Supreme Court has noted: A motion nunc pro tunc is used to make the record speak the truth; it may not be used to correct the court’s failure to speak. In other words, the function of a nunc pro tunc order is not to make an order then for now, but to enter now for then an order previously made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to show what the court might or should have decided, or intended to decide, as distinguished from what it actually did decide.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.