State v. Herrerra’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Sometimes, the cost of excluding evidence is not justified by the rule and its purposes.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 439 N.J. Super. 471 - State of New Jersey v. Gale Sorensen · 436 N.J. Super. 440 - State of New Jersey v. Calvin Presley

2. “of an illegal search or seizure. The rule serves a number of important purposes: to deter misconduct by the police and thereby guarantee the protections provided by the Fourth Amendment and Article I, Paragraph 7 of the New Jersey Constitution to ensure that police do not”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 454 N.J. Super. 25 - State v. Sencion

3. “from lawless behavior, and to preserve the integrity of the courts by not providing a forum for tainted evidence. [ State v. Herrerra , 211 N.J. 308 , 330, 48 A.3d 1009 (2012) (citations omitted).] N.J.S.A. 2C:18-3 states,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 454 N.J. Super. 25 - State v. Sencion