Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 N.J. Super. 472 - Ariston Airline & Cater. Sup. Co., Inc. v. Forbes

211 N.J. Super. 472 - Ariston Airline & Cater. Sup. Co., Inc. v. Forbes’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
5
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 18 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably 203 W. Va. 477 - Murray v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (1998), Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of America (1989)

3 federal appellate · 18 district · 24 state decisions

240198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kievit v. Loyal Protective Life Insurance · Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co. · Government Employees Insurance v. DeJames · Butler v. Bonner & Barnewall, Inc. · Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “recovery may be allowed ... where the insured risk itself set into operation a chain of causation in which the last step may have been an excepted risk.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “words `earth gmovement,' like other language in policies being construed, must be read in the light of other words contained in the same exclusion”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “An `all risk' policy is a special type of coverage extending to risks not usually covered under other insurance, and recovery is allowed thereunder for all losses, other than those resulting from a willful or fraudulent act of the insured, unless the policy contains a specific provision expressly excluding a particular loss from coverage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.