Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

211 Or. App. 388

154 P.3d 173

State v. Burdick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 14, 2007

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 2007-03-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2007

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-03-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM

¶1Defendant was charged with possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992(4)(b) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005), and entered a conditional plea of guilty after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress, because the evidence was found after defendant consented to a search of his car at a time when he had been stopped without reasonable suspicion. The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), the evidence should have been suppressed. We accept the state’s concession as well-founded.

¶2Reversed and remanded.

/211/orapp/388 · .json · Public domain