Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 SO3D 176 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 448 So. 2d 1013 - State v. Rhoden · Edler v. State · 381 So. 2d 1361 - State v. Cain · 459 So. 2d 306 - Tucker v. State · 314 So. 2d 573 - Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Must a defendant, who claims that the offense as charged in the information is barred by the statute of limitations, raise the issue in the trial court in order to preserve the issue for direct appeal?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.