211 So. 3d 449 - Farrar v. Whaley’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 31 U.S.C. § 3105
Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Canter v. Koehring Company · Free v. Bland · Housley v. Cerise · 452 So. 2d 1161 - Succession of Lyons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A donation inter vivos is a contract by which a person, called the donor, gratuitously divests himself, at present and irrevocably, of the thing given in favor of another, called the donee, who accepts it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The discretion of the trial court to assess court costs is vast[,] and is not subject to reversal unless there is an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The donation inter vivos of a corporeal movable may also be made by delivery of the thing to the donee without any other formality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.