Zundelowitz v. Waggoner’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1935
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. Co. · North American Accident Ins. Co. v. Miller · 14 Tex. Civ. App. 583 - Ingram v. Abbott · Houston v. Darnell Lumber Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““I wanted to set this trade aside because he [Waggoner] said it was to be a dry hole, and on the basis of that he was going to sell it. It made a big difference to me whether it was going to be a dry hole. If I had known the well was a producing well, I would not have sold it for $37.50.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““We do not think that this omission vitiates the charge, as this qualification would be implied; besides, the explanation which follows this general statement in the charge leaves no room for mistake as to the meaning thereof.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.