Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

211 S.W.3d 149

Haynes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 2007

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2007-01-09

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2012

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-01-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Order

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Lankford Haynes (Haynes) appeals the denial of his post-conviction motion to vacate the judgment and sentence under Rule 29.15. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

/211/sw3d/149 · .json · Public domain