Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Redeemer v. State · Copas v. State · State v. Rowan · Waserman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the context of a guilty plea, a movant establishes prejudice due to ineffective assistance of counsel by demonstrating that a reasonable probability exists that, but for plea counsel’s errors, the movant would not have entered a guilty plea and would have insisted on proceeding to trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Oliphant v. State“Findings of fact and conclusions of law are clearly erroneous only if our review of the entire record leaves us with the definite and firm impression that a mistake has been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Borneman v. State“limited to a determination of whether the findings and conclusions of the [motion] court are clearly erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Borneman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.