Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 U.S. 575 - Page v. Rogers

Page v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

211 U.S. 575 · 1909

Citation profile

226
cited by 226 later decisions
9
cited 9 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

105 federal appellate · 43 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 226 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2009 · most notably Texas Co v. Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks (1930), Sexton v. Kessler & Co. (1912)

105 federal appellate · 43 district · 3 state decisions

54019091910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedPage v. Rogers (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank · Wilson v. Nelson · Mary Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Association W · In re Broadway Savings Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 226 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * In view of the fact that this suit was brought in the bankruptcy court itself, and a final decree is to be entered by the judge of that court, it is entirely practicable to avoid the circuitous proceeding of compelling the defendant to pay into the bankruptcy court the full amount of the preference which he has received, and then to resort to the same court to obtain part of it back by way of dividend. The defendant may be permitted, if he shall be so advised, to prove his claim against the estate of the bankrupt, and the bankrupt court then may settle the amount of the dividend coming to him, and the final decree may direct him to pay over the full amount of his preference, with interest, less the amount of his dividend. * * *”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.