Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 211 VA 108 - Cameron v. Commonwealth

Cameron v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Stamper v. Commonwealth (1979), 41 Va. App. 250 - Kelly v. Commonwealth (2003)

47 state decisions

14019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crisman v. Commonwealth · CORRETT v. Commonwealth · Cox v. Commonwealth · Wooden v. Commonwealth · Jones and Hall v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled in Virginia that to justify conviction of a crime, it is not sufficient to create a suspicion or probability of guilt, but the evidence must establish the guilt of an accused beyond a reasonable doubt. It must exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt. The guilt of a party is not to be inferred because the facts are consistent with his guilt, but they must be inconsistent with his innocence.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged after conviction it is our duty to view it in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.