211 Wis. 2d 12 - State v. Ramos’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

52 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the use of a peremptory challenge to correct a trial court error is adequate grounds for reversal because it arbitrarily deprives the defendant of a statutorily granted right.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Jimmie R.R. · 214 Wis. 2d 268 - State v. Ferron

2. “The question of whether a prospective juror is biased and should be dismissed from the jury panel for cause is a matter of the circuit court's discretion.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 219 Wis. 2d 481 - State v. Ferron · 214 Wis. 2d 268 - State v. Ferron

3. “Because peremptory challenges are a creature of statute and are not required by the [federal] Constitution, it is for the State to determine the number of peremptory challenges allowed and to define their purpose and the manner of their exercise. As such, the 'right1 to peremptory challenges is 'denied or impaired' only if the defendant does not receive that which state law provides.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 227 Wis. 2d 736 - State v. Kiernan · State v. Lindell