211 Wis. 2d 269 - State v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably State v. Harvey (2002), Luurtsema v. Commissioner of Correction (2011)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Teague v. Lane · Sandstrom v. Montana · Duncan v. State of Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“beyond the power of the criminal law-making authority to proscribe”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“at the time of the jury instruction and verdict conference. Id. at 289. Citing Wis. Stat. § 805.13 (3) (1989–90), this court stated as follows: Here, Howard and his counsel in 1990 had no way to know how this court would construe Wis. Stat. § 939.63 [1989–90] by the time it decided Peete in 1994. We agree that Howard's counsel had an obligation to object at the instructions conference based on incompleteness or other error about which he knew or should have known. We cannot agree that 13 No. 2017AP1206-CR Howard's counsel could have stated grounds for an objection”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.