¶1—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: In the absence of "special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances spelled out in factual detail”, Supreme Court should not have permitted a physical examination of plaintiff after the note of issue and statement of readiness had been filed (Laudico v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 125 AD2d 960, 961; see, 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; Siegel, NY Prac §370 [2d ed]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.—Discovery.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
212 A.D.2d 1053
Tedesco v. Murawski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 3, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1995-02-03
Decided 1995-02-03