Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

212 A.D.2d 619

Scott v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1995-02-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1996

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-02-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1—Appeal by the petitioner from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), entered September 16, 1992, which dismissed his proceeding to review a determination of the respondent dated January 1, 1992, and (2) an order of the same court entered September 29, 1992, which denied his motion to reargue.

¶2Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

¶3Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

¶4We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues *620which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

/212/ad2d/619 · .json · Public domain