Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 Ariz. 1 - State v. Wall

State v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

101 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez (2007), State v. Andriano (2007)

101 state decisions

620200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beck v. Alabama · Sansone v. United States · Keeble v. United States · State v. Salazar · State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An error of law committed in reaching a discretionary conclusion may, however, constitute an abuse of discretion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “who with the intent to promote or facilitate the commission of an offense: 1. Solicits or commands another person to commit the offense; or 2. Aids, counsels, agrees to aid or attempts to aid another person in planning or committing the offense[; or] 3. Provides means or opportunity to another person to commit the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) . . . the state [has] failed to prove an element of the greater offense and (b) . . . the evidence is sufficient to support a conviction on the lesser offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.