Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 Ariz. 55 - State v. Gomez

State v. Gomez’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

74 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Hansen (2007), State v. McGill (2006)

74 state decisions

490200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Lewis v. United States · Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc. · Hayes v. Continental Insurance · State v. Lindsey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]nterest and other income from investments of monies in any account shall be credited to that account except as otherwise provided by law. " A.R.S. § 8-1181(E) (emphasis added). [3] C ¶ 9 The State contends the emphasized language authorizes the legislature to reallocate investment and interest income by a simple majority enactment to the general fund. Thus, the State argues, the transfer of the $7 million to the general fund neither amends the voter-approved initiative nor diverts funds, and the supermajority provisions of Ariz. Const. art. 4, pt. 1, § 1(6)(C) and (D) do not apply. III ¶ 10 "Our primary objective in construing statutes adopted by initiative is to give effect to the intent of the electorate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “construe statutes, when possible, to avoid constitutional difficulties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “we consider the statute's context; its language, subject matter, and historical background; its effects and consequences; and its spirit and purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.