Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 Ark. 581 - Norton v. Hickingbottom

Norton v. Hickingbottom’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 1972
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1972

3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

501947195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on White Black Rivers Bridge Company v. Vaughan · Rogers v. Atkinson · Queen of Arkansas Insurance v. Royal · Reiff v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'n · O'Neal v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is quite probable that the jury did just what appellants claim; but the appeal is here without a bill of exceptions and our consideration extends only to the face of the record.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.