State v. Grullon’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
123 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably State v. Robinson (1989), State v. Tomasko (1996)
123 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Katz v. United States · Sherman v. United States · Krulewitch v. United States · Graham v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) A person is guilty of criminal conspiracy when, with intent that conduct constituting a crime be performed, he agrees with one or more persons to engage in or cause the performance of such conduct, and any one of them takes a substantial step in pursuance of such agreement. (2) It shall not be a defense to criminal conspiracy that the person or persons with whom the accused is alleged to have conspired: (a) Has not been prosecuted or convicted; or (b) Has been convicted of a different offense; or (c) Is not amenable to justice; or (d) Has been acquitted; or (e) Lacked the capacity to commit an offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“`the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation' so long as `the selection was [not] deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.