In re Octave Mining Co.’s Empirical Analysis
212 F. 457 · 1914
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1936
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Grant · In re Foss · In re Nichols
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is manifest that the mode prescribed by General Order 27 is the only manner in which the decisions of the referee may be reviewed. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Faerstein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.