Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 F.1d 935 - Knight v. Rieger

Knight v. Rieger’s Empirical Analysis

212 F. 935 · 1914

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
November 1916
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Fisk · Reckendorfer v. Faber · Hollister v. Benedict Burnham Manuf'G · Smith v. Nichols · McArthur v. Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In other words, as apjiears to us, appellant merely brings these two factors into juxtaposition and concurrent use,- but does not in fact produce any new or novel combination within the meaning and intent of the patent law. As we see the matter, it comes in reality to the question of the relative desirability of different modes of construction neither of which involves any display ot inventive genius.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.