Allain v. Tummon’s Empirical Analysis
212 F.2d 32 · 1954
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 1990 · most notably Brotherhood of Railway, Airline, & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. (1982), Meeks v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad (1984)
20 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 45 U.S.C. § 153 (Railway Labor Act)
Relies on State of New York v. United States · Murray v. United States · Ritter v. United States · Hunter v. Atchison · Kirby v. Pennsylvania R.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““shall give due notice of all hearings to the employee or employees and the carrier or carriers involved in any "dispute submitted to them.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The award and order of the National Railroad Adjustment Board, 4734, is illegal and void, in that it was rendered by said Board without giving members of BRS notice, and without the members of BRS having an opportunity in the hearing to be heard before the National Railroad Adjustment Board.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is 'well established that an award made by the Board in the absence of due notice to the involved parties is void.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.