Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 212 F.2d 446 - United States v. Baysek

United States v. Baysek’s Empirical Analysis

212 F.2d 446 · 1954

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 1994
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 1994

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

6019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Michelson v. United States · Edgington v. United States · Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · Remington Rand, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consider the character evidence with the other evidence in the case and ... acquit the defendant if the character evidence, either alone or considered with the other evidence, raised a reasonable doubt of his guilt”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must have understood that if after consideration of all the evidence, including the character evidence, they were satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt they should convict him even though he offered evidence of good character.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If, however, you are satisfied the Defendant is guilty, you should convict him, notwithstanding proof of good character.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.